North Macedonia

Freedom of Association Indicator

The Labour Rights Index 2024 (LRI 2024) is a de-jure index covering 145 economies and structured around the working lifespan of a worker. In total, 46 questions or evaluation criteria are scored across 10 indicators. The overall score is calculated by taking the average of each indicator, with 100 being the highest possible score. The Index uses a rating system, ranging from “Total Lack of Decent Work” to “Decent Work”. The Labour Rights Index aims at an active contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals, by providing necessary (complementary) insights into de jure provisions on issues covered in particular by SDG8 (Decent Jobs), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 16 (Strong Institutions). The Index is based on national labour legislation, applicable on 1 January 2024.

North Macedonia’s overall score is 86 out of 100. The overall score for North Macedonia is lower than the regional average observed across Eastern Europe (88). Within the Eastern Europe, the highest score is observed for Greece & Hungary (96).

North Macedonia ratified Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise (1948) in 1991 and Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining (1949) in 1991.

Question

Answer

Score

Legal Basis

More Info

Does the law allow workers to form and join unions of their own choice?

Yes

1

§20 & 37 of the Constitution of the North Macedonia,2019; §184 & 185 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (North Macedonia)

Does the law allow workers to bargain collectively with employers through their representative unions?

Yes

1

§203-206 & 212 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; ITUC Global Rights Index 2024, North Macedonia Profile; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (North Macedonia)

Does the law provide for the right to strike?

No

0

§236 & 237 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; ILO CEACR, C87, Obs. 2023; ITUC Global Rights Index 2024, North Macedonia Profile

Does the law prohibit imposing of excessive sanctions against striking workers?

No

0

§25 of the Law on Secondary Education; §237-239 & 242 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; ILO CEACR, C87, Obs. 2023; ITUC Global Rights Index 2024, North Macedonia Profile

Textual sources

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations (latest report)

C : ITUC

ITUC: ITUC Global Rights Index

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

LRI Country Score
The Labour Rights Index has 10 indicators and 46 sub-indicators. The LRI Country score averages 10 indicators and ranges between 0 and 100. The lowest and highest scorers are Nigeria (29/100) and Belgium/Greece (96/100). https://labourrightsindex.org/  

Freedom of Association Indicator
The Freedom of Association indicator is composed of 4 sub-indicators. Scoring is done through the binary method (0 or 1). The score ranges between 0-100. 

Trade union density rate (%)
The trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on trade union density, please check ILOSTAT

Collective bargaining coverage rate (%)
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on collective bargaining coverage, please check ILOSTAT

SDG indicator 8.8.2
SDG indicator 8.8.2 measures national compliance with fundamental labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining or FACB). It ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). It is based on six ILO supervisory body textual sources and national legislation.
For an updated assessment on SDG indicator 8.8.2, please check ILOSTAT. 

ITUC Global Rights Index 2024 Ratings
The ITUC Global Rights Index depicts the world’s worst countries for workers by rating 148 countries on a scale from 1 to 5+ on the degree of respect for workers’ rights. Violations are recorded each year from April to March.  For a detailed description of ratings and methodology, please follow the link

Information

Source: §20 & 37 of the Constitution of the North Macedonia,2019; §184 & 185 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (North Macedonia)

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

"The law provided for the right of workers to form and join independent unions, bargain collectively, and conduct legal strikes. .............. The law covered those working for employers that were registered with the government and did not discriminate against foreign workers or migrants who were legally employed. The Ministry of Labor’s State Labor Inspectorate (SLI) did not receive any complaints over violations of the right to union organization and freedom of association"

Information

Source: §203-206 & 212 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; ITUC Global Rights Index 2024, North Macedonia Profile; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (North Macedonia)

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

"The law provided for the right of workers to form and join independent unions, bargain collectively, and conduct legal strikes ...... Collective bargaining was restricted to trade unions representing at least 20 percent of the employees and employers’ associations representing at least 10 percent of the employers at the level at which the agreement was concluded (company, sector, or country)."

C : ITUC

ITUC Global Rights Index (country legal profile)

"Collective bargaining is restricted to representative unions, i.e. those representing 33% of employees at the level at which the agreement is concluded (company, sector or country), or belonging to a representative association at a higher level. Several unions may join forces to meet the 33% requirement, but only if there is no single union that is representative. "

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

"Art. 212(4) A representative trade union at a brunch level shall be the trade union having at least 20% of the total number of employed persons with the employer as its members paying membership fee. (5) A representative trade union at employer level shall be the trade union entered in the trade union registry being kept by the ministry competent for labour affairs having at least 20% of the total number of employed persons in the brunch as its members paying membership fee."

Information

Source: §236 & 237 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; ILO CEACR, C87, Obs. 2023; ITUC Global Rights Index 2024, North Macedonia Profile

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"Article 3. Right of organizations to freely organize their activities and to formulate their programmes. In its previous comments the Committee had noted that, under the Law on Public Enterprises and the Law on Employees in the Public Sector: (1) employees in the public sector are obliged to provide minimum services in the event of strikes, taking into account the rights and interests of citizens and legal entities; and (2) the head of the respective institution determines the performance of the institutional activities of public interest that are to be maintained during a strike, the manner in which the minimum service will be carried out and the number of employees that will provide services during the strike. In this respect, the Committee had recalled that the maintenance of minimum services in the event of strikes should only be possible in the following situations: (i) in services the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population (essential services in the strict sense of the term); (ii) other services in which strikes of a certain magnitude and duration could cause an acute crisis threatening the normal conditions of existence of the population; (iii) in public services of fundamental importance; and (iv) to ensure the security of facilities and the maintenance of equipment. The Committee had further recalled that minimum services imposed should meet at least two requirements: (i) they must genuinely and exclusively be minimum services, that is limited to the operations which are strictly necessary to meet the basic needs of the population or the minimum requirements of the service, while maintaining the effectiveness of the pressure brought to bear; and (ii) since this system restricts one of the essential means of pressure available to workers to defend their interests, their organizations should be able, if they so wish, to participate in defining such a service, along with employers and the public authorities. The Committee had requested the Government to amend the legislation so as to ensure that the determination of minimum services in public enterprises conformed with the situations described above, and to provide further information concerning such determination in practice (in particular as to the types of activities, and percentage of employees in those activities, that have been affected by a determination of minimum services, as well as the possibility for employee organizations to participate in the definition of minimum services)."

C : ITUC

ITUC Global Rights Index (country legal profile)

"Trade unions are obliged to specify the duration of a strike in advance. The Labour Relations Act gives employers the right to suspend up to 2% of strikers for the duration of the action if they display violent or "undemocratic" behaviour. This provision has been used to exclude "disruptive" union leaders from negotiations. Under the Law on Public Enterprises and the Law on Public Sector Employees, public sector employees have the right to strike, but are obliged to provide minimum services taking into account the rights and interests of citizens and legal entities. In addition, the head of the respective institution determines the performance of institutional activities in the public interest that must be maintained during a strike, the manner in which the minimum service will be carried out, and the number of employees who will provide services during the strike."

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

"Art. 236 (5) The letter of strike announcement must contain the reasons, place and duration of the strike, as well as the date and time of starting the strike. Excluding from the Working Process Article 237 (1) The employer may exclude employees from the working process only as response to already started strike. (2) The number of employees excluded from work must not be higher than 2% of the number of employees involved in the strike. (3) The employer may exclude form work only those employees who stimulate violent and undemocratic behaviour, thus impeding the negotiations between the employees and the employer. (4) The employer shall be obliged to pay the contributions determined by the special regulations as lowest basic amount for paying the contributions to the employees excluded from work for the period they are excluded from work."

Information

Source: §25 of the Law on Secondary Education; §237-239 & 242 of the Labour Relations Law as amended in 2018; ILO CEACR, C87, Obs. 2023; ITUC Global Rights Index 2024, North Macedonia Profile

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"The Committee recalls that it had previously requested the Government to amend section 38(7) of the Law on Primary Education and section 25(2) of the Law on Secondary Education, which oblige the school directors to provide for the realization of educational activities by replacing the striking employees when the educational activity is interrupted due to a strike. The Committee notes the Government’s indication that while it has not yet amended the above-mentioned legislation, in practice, these provisions were not referred to during the education strike in April 2022 organized by the Trade Union for Education, Science and Culture and no substitute workers were used. The Committee further notes the Government’s commitment to remove the above provisions during the next amendments to the Law on Primary Education and the Law on Secondary Education. The Committee expects the Government to proceed without further delay to amending theLaw on Primary Education and the Law on Secondary Education, so as to remove the possibility of replacing striking workers and to enable workers in the primary and secondary education sectors to effectively exercise their right to strike. The Committee requests the Government to provide a copy of the amended legal texts once adopted."

C : ITUC

ITUC Global Rights Index (country legal profile)

"Article 38, paragraph 7, of the Primary Education Act and Article 25, paragraph 2, of the Secondary Education Act oblige school principals to provide for the implementation of educational activities by replacing striking employees when educational activity is interrupted due to a strike."

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

"Art.25 of the secondary education act ......... In the event of an interruption of educational work due to a strike, the director of the secondary school, with prior consent from the mayor, and for state secondary schools from the minister, is obliged to ensure the implementation of the educational work by replacing the employees who are on strike, for during the strike. Labour relations act; Excluding from the Working Process Article 237 (1) The employer may exclude employees from the working process only as response to already started strike. (2) The number of employees excluded from work must not be higher than 2% of the number of employees involved in the strike. (3) The employer may exclude form work only those employees who stimulate violent and undemocratic behaviour, thus impeding the negotiations between the employees and the employer."