Angola

Freedom of Association Indicator

The Labour Rights Index 2024 (LRI 2024) is a de-jure index covering 145 economies and structured around the working lifespan of a worker. In total, 46 questions or evaluation criteria are scored across 10 indicators. The overall score is calculated by taking the average of each indicator, with 100 being the highest possible score. The Index uses a rating system, ranging from “Total Lack of Decent Work” to “Decent Work”. The Labour Rights Index aims at an active contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals, by providing necessary (complementary) insights into de jure provisions on issues covered in particular by SDG8 (Decent Jobs), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 16 (Strong Institutions). The Index is based on national labour legislation, applicable on 1 January 2024.

Angola’s overall score is 80 out of 100. The overall score for Angola is greater than the regional average observed across Sub-Saharan Africa (66). Within the Sub-Saharan Africa region, the highest score is observed for Côte d’Ivoire (84.5).

Angola ratified Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise (1948) in 2001 and Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining (1949) in 1976.

Question

Answer

Score

Legal Basis

More Info

Does the law allow workers to form and join unions of their own choice?

Yes

1

§50 of the Constitution 2010; §4-17 of the Trade Union Act, 1992

Does the law allow workers to bargain collectively with employers through their representative unions?

No

0

§50 of the Constitution, 2010; §01 of the Trade Union Act, 1992; Collective Bargaining Act, 1992; CEACR, C98, Obs. 2023

Does the law provide for the right to strike?

No

0

§51 of the Constitution 2010; Strike Law 1991 (Lei n°. 23/91 de 15 de Junho); CEACR, C87, DR 2023

Does the law prohibit imposing of excessive sanctions against striking workers?

Yes

1

No violative legal provisions could be located

Textual sources

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations (latest report)

C : ITUC

ITUC: ITUC Global Rights Index

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

LRI Country Score
The Labour Rights Index has 10 indicators and 46 sub-indicators. The LRI Country score averages 10 indicators and ranges between 0 and 100. The lowest and highest scorers are Nigeria (29/100) and Belgium/Greece (96/100). https://labourrightsindex.org/  

Freedom of Association Indicator
The Freedom of Association indicator is composed of 4 sub-indicators. Scoring is done through the binary method (0 or 1). The score ranges between 0-100. 

Trade union density rate (%)
The trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on trade union density, please check ILOSTAT

Collective bargaining coverage rate (%)
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on collective bargaining coverage, please check ILOSTAT

SDG indicator 8.8.2
SDG indicator 8.8.2 measures national compliance with fundamental labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining or FACB). It ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). It is based on six ILO supervisory body textual sources and national legislation.
For an updated assessment on SDG indicator 8.8.2, please check ILOSTAT. 

ITUC Global Rights Index 2024 Ratings
The ITUC Global Rights Index depicts the world’s worst countries for workers by rating 148 countries on a scale from 1 to 5+ on the degree of respect for workers’ rights. Violations are recorded each year from April to March.  For a detailed description of ratings and methodology, please follow the link

Information

Source: §50 of the Constitution 2010; §4-17 of the Trade Union Act, 1992

Information

Source: §50 of the Constitution, 2010; §01 of the Trade Union Act, 1992; Collective Bargaining Act, 1992; CEACR, C98, Obs. 2023

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"Article 4. Measures to promote collective bargaining. Compulsory arbitration. The Committee recalls that for several years it has been requesting the Government to take the necessary measures to amend sections 20 and 28 of Act No. 20-A/92 on the right to collective bargaining, which impose compulsory arbitration in terms contrary to the indications of the Committee. In its previous comments, the Committee noted that section 273(2) of the General Labour Act No. 7/2015 establishes that collective labour disputes shall be resolved through mediation, conciliation and voluntary arbitration, without prejudice to specific legislation, and further noted that section 293 establishes that collective labour disputes shall be settled preferably through voluntary arbitration. Given that the General Labour Act of 2015 repeals any contrary provision, the Committee requested the Government to indicate whether sections 20 and 28 of Act No. 20 A/92, which impose compulsory arbitration on an array of non-essential services, had been repealed or whether these sections remained in force. The Committee notes that the Government indicates that there is indeed a contradiction between the two above-mentioned items of legislation and that the contradiction should be resolved when Act No. 20-A/92 is revised. Recalling that compulsory arbitration in the context of collective bargaining is only acceptable in relation to public servants engaged in the administration of the State (Article 6 of the Convention), essential services in the strict sense of the term (services the interruption of which would endanger the life, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population) and in the event of an acute national crisis, the Committee expects that sections 20 and 28 of Act No. 20-A/92 will be amended rapidly and requests the Government to provide information on any progress achieved in this regard."

Information

Source: §51 of the Constitution 2010; Strike Law 1991 (Lei n°. 23/91 de 15 de Junho); CEACR, C87, DR 2023

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"The CEACR urged the Government to "amend section 10 of the Strikes Act, which provides that a strike may be declared only if two-thirds of the workers present and also urges to amend section 20(3) of the Strikes Act, which allows workers to be requisitioned in the event of a strike in (a) the postal services; (b) fuel supply; (c) public transport; and (d) the loading and unloading of foodstuffs, since these are not essential services in the strict sense of the term (that is, services the interruption of which would endanger the lives, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population). The Committee recalls that, although employers may require compliance with minimum services, which are determined with the participation of workers’ organizations, requisitioning by a decision of the administrative authorities should only be possible in the following circumstances: (i) in the public service, only for public servants exercising authority on behalf of the State; (ii) in essential services in the strict sense of the term, namely, services the interruption of which would endanger the lives, personal safety or health of the whole or part of the population; and (iii) in an acute national crisis. "

Information

Source: No violative legal provisions could be located

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

"The government and employers at times employed practices that limited or violated these rights by replacing striking workers and using threats of violence to end strikes."