Mexico

Freedom of Association Indicator

The Labour Rights Index 2024 (LRI 2024) is a de-jure index covering 145 economies and structured around the working lifespan of a worker. In total, 46 questions or evaluation criteria are scored across 10 indicators. The overall score is calculated by taking the average of each indicator, with 100 being the highest possible score. The Index uses a rating system, ranging from “Total Lack of Decent Work” to “Decent Work”. The Labour Rights Index aims at an active contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals, by providing necessary (complementary) insights into de jure provisions on issues covered in particular by SDG8 (Decent Jobs), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 16 (Strong Institutions). The Index is based on national labour legislation, applicable on 1 January 2024.

Mexico’s overall score is 74 out of 100. The overall score for Mexico is greater than the regional average observed across Latin America and The Caribbean (73). Within Latin America and The Caribbean, the highest score is observed in Brazil (85.5).

Mexico ratified Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise (1948) in 1950 and the Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining (1949) in 2018.

Question

Answer

Score

Legal Basis

More Info

Does the law allow workers to form and join unions of their own choice?

Yes

1

§123-A-XVI of the Constitution, 1917; §354-385 of Federal Labour Law, 1970; CEACR C87 Obs. 2021

Does the law allow workers to bargain collectively with employers through their representative unions?

No

0

§107 and 123 of the Constitution, 1917; §386-403 of Federal Labour Law, 1970; CEACR C98 DR 2021

Does the law provide for the right to strike?

No

0

§123-A-XVI-XVIII of the Constitution, 1917; §440-471 of Federal Labour Law, 1970; CEACR C87 DR 2021

Does the law prohibit imposing of excessive sanctions against striking workers?

Yes

1

§123-A-XVI-XVIII, Constitution 1917; §133, 440-471, Federal Labour Law 1970; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (Mexico)

Textual sources

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations (latest report)

C : ITUC

ITUC: ITUC Global Rights Index

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

LRI Country Score
The Labour Rights Index has 10 indicators and 46 sub-indicators. The LRI Country score averages 10 indicators and ranges between 0 and 100. The lowest and highest scorers are Nigeria (29/100) and Belgium/Greece (96/100). https://labourrightsindex.org/  

Freedom of Association Indicator
The Freedom of Association indicator is composed of 4 sub-indicators. Scoring is done through the binary method (0 or 1). The score ranges between 0-100. 

Trade union density rate (%)
The trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on trade union density, please check ILOSTAT

Collective bargaining coverage rate (%)
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on collective bargaining coverage, please check ILOSTAT

SDG indicator 8.8.2
SDG indicator 8.8.2 measures national compliance with fundamental labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining or FACB). It ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). It is based on six ILO supervisory body textual sources and national legislation.
For an updated assessment on SDG indicator 8.8.2, please check ILOSTAT. 

ITUC Global Rights Index 2024 Ratings
The ITUC Global Rights Index depicts the world’s worst countries for workers by rating 148 countries on a scale from 1 to 5+ on the degree of respect for workers’ rights. Violations are recorded each year from April to March.  For a detailed description of ratings and methodology, please follow the link

Information

Source: §123-A-XVI of the Constitution, 1917; §354-385 of Federal Labour Law, 1970; CEACR C87 Obs. 2021

Information

Source: §107 and 123 of the Constitution, 1917; §386-403 of Federal Labour Law, 1970; CEACR C98 DR 2021

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"Articles 4 and 6. Collective bargaining of public servants not engaged in the administration of the State. The Committee notes that the Federal Act on State Employees (LFTSE) excludes from collective bargaining all workers covered by this Act, as it sets out in section 87 that the general conditions of work of the workers covered by the Act are fixed by the respective head of the competent agency, taking account of the opinion of the corresponding trade union where so requested, and that such conditions are revised every three years. The Committee recalls that persons employed in the public sector but who do not carry out activities related to the administration of the State (employees in public enterprises, municipal employees and those in decentralized entities, public sector teachers, and transport personnel, etc.) are covered by the Convention and should be able to negotiate collectively their conditions of employment, including their wage conditions, and that mere consultation of the unions concerned is not sufficient to meet the requirements of the Convention in this respect (see the 2012 General Survey, paragraphs 172 and 219). In light of the above, the Committee requests the Government to indicate the available mechanisms for the promotion of collective bargaining, established in conformity with the Convention for persons employed in the public sector but not engaged in the administration of the State. "

Information

Source: §123-A-XVI-XVIII of the Constitution, 1917; §440-471 of Federal Labour Law, 1970; CEACR C87 DR 2021

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"Article 3. Right of workers’ organizations to organize their activities and to formulate their programmes. The Committee recalls that for many years it has been requesting the Government to take the necessary measures to amend various aspects of the legislation on the right to strike of state employees, particularly: (i) section 99(II) of the Federal Act on State Employees (LFTSE), which establishes the requirement of two thirds of the workers in the public body concerned to call a strike; (ii) the legislation that restricts the right to strike of certain state employees (including workers in the banking sector and those in many decentralized public bodies, such as the National Lottery and the Housing Institute) only to situations involving a general and systematic violation of their rights (section 94, Title 4, of the LFTSE, and section 5 of the Act issuing regulations under article 123B(XIII bis) of the Constitution); and (iii) several laws and regulations related to public services (the Railway Regulations Act, the National Vehicle Registration Act, the General Channels of Communication Act and the internal regulations of the Ministry of Communications and Transport), which provide for the possibility of requisitioning staff in the event that the national economy is affected. The Committee notes that, although the Government had previously reported on a legislative initiative proposing the reform of various provisions of the LFTSE to enable the workers concerned to exercise the right to strike, in its latest report the Government merely indicates that the requested amendments were not made. The Committee also notes that the National Workers’ Union (UNT) reports that the right to strike is practically impossible for state employees. While requesting the Government to provide its observations in this respect, the Committee expresses the firm hope that it will be able to note progress relating to the various amendments to the LFTSE referred to above, and any other measures deemed necessary to ensure that workers not exercising authority in the name of the State can exercise the right to strike. The Committee requests the Government to keep it informed of any developments in this regard."

Information

Source: §123-A-XVI-XVIII, Constitution 1917; §133, 440-471, Federal Labour Law 1970; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (Mexico)

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

"Federal labor law prohibited antiunion discrimination and prohibited employers from intervening in union affairs or interfering with union activities, including through implicit or explicit reprisals against workers. The law allowed for the reinstatement of workers if the court found the employer fired the worker without just cause and the worker requested reinstatement; however, the law also exempted broad categories of employees from this protection, including so-called trusted employees and workers in the job for less than one year."