United Kingdom

Freedom of Association Indicator

The Labour Rights Index 2024 (LRI 2024) is a de-jure index covering 145 economies and structured around the working lifespan of a worker. In total, 46 questions or evaluation criteria are scored across 10 indicators. The overall score is calculated by taking the average of each indicator, with 100 being the highest possible score. The Index uses a rating system, ranging from “Total Lack of Decent Work” to “Decent Work”. The Labour Rights Index aims at an active contribution to the Sustainable Development Goals, by providing necessary (complementary) insights into de jure provisions on issues covered in particular by SDG8 (Decent Jobs), SDG 5 (Gender Equality), SDG 10 (Reduced Inequalities) and SDG 16 (Strong Institutions). The Index is based on national labour legislation, applicable on 1 January 2024.

United Kingdom’s overall score is 88 out of 100. The overall score for United Kingdom is lower than the regional average observed across Western Europe (92). Within the Western Europe, the highest score is observed for Belgium (95.5).

Ukraine ratified Convention No. 87 on Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise (1948) in 1956 and Convention No. 98 on the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining (1949) in 1956.

Question

Answer

Score

Legal Basis

More Info

Does the law allow workers to form and join unions of their own choice?

Yes

1

§47 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; Trade Union Act, 2016

Does the law allow workers to bargain collectively with employers through their representative unions?

Yes

1

§70A-70C & 178 of Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; Trade Union Act, 2016

Does the law provide for the right to strike?

Yes

1

§226, 229, 237 & 238, Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; §8-9,Trade Union Act, 2016

Does the law prohibit imposing of excessive sanctions against striking workers?

Yes

1

§229, 237 & 238, Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act, 1992; §26 of Employment Relations Act 2004; The Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003, Regulation 7; CEACR, C87, Obs. 2023; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (UK)

Textual sources

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations (latest report)

C : ITUC

ITUC: ITUC Global Rights Index

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

LRI Country Score
The Labour Rights Index has 10 indicators and 46 sub-indicators. The LRI Country score averages 10 indicators and ranges between 0 and 100. The lowest and highest scorers are Nigeria (29/100) and Belgium/Greece (96/100). https://labourrightsindex.org/  

Freedom of Association Indicator
The Freedom of Association indicator is composed of 4 sub-indicators. Scoring is done through the binary method (0 or 1). The score ranges between 0-100. 

Trade union density rate (%)
The trade union density rate conveys the number of union members who are employees as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on trade union density, please check ILOSTAT

Collective bargaining coverage rate (%)
The collective bargaining coverage rate conveys the number of employees whose pay and/or conditions of employment are determined by one or more collective agreement(s) as a percentage of the total number of employees in the country. For updated statistics on collective bargaining coverage, please check ILOSTAT

SDG indicator 8.8.2
SDG indicator 8.8.2 measures national compliance with fundamental labour rights (freedom of association and collective bargaining or FACB). It ranges from 0 to 10, with 0 being the best possible score (indicating higher levels of compliance with FACB rights) and 10 the worst (indicating lower levels of compliance with FACB rights). It is based on six ILO supervisory body textual sources and national legislation.
For an updated assessment on SDG indicator 8.8.2, please check ILOSTAT. 

ITUC Global Rights Index 2024 Ratings
The ITUC Global Rights Index depicts the world’s worst countries for workers by rating 148 countries on a scale from 1 to 5+ on the degree of respect for workers’ rights. Violations are recorded each year from April to March.  For a detailed description of ratings and methodology, please follow the link

Information

Source: §47 of the Employment Rights Act 1996; Trade Union Act, 2016

Information

Source: §70A-70C & 178 of Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; Trade Union Act, 2016

Information

Source: §226, 229, 237 & 238, Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992; §8-9,Trade Union Act, 2016

A : National Law

National Labour Legislation

"Two weeks' notice to be given to employers of industrial action (1)In section 234A of the 1992 Act (notice to employers of industrial action), in subsection (4), for paragraph (b) substitute— “(b)ending with the 14th day before the starting date, or the seventh day before that date if the union and the employer so agree.In paragraph (b) “starting date” means the day, or the first of the days, specified in the relevant notice.” (2)Subsection (1) does not apply to any industrial action in relation to which the employer receives a relevant notice before the day on which this section comes into force."

Information

Source: §229, 237 & 238, Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act, 1992; §26 of Employment Relations Act 2004; The Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003, Regulation 7; CEACR, C87, Obs. 2023; USDOS CRHRP 2023 (UK)

B : CEACR

CEACR: ILO Committee of Experts on Application of Conventions and Recommendations

"Article 3. Return of workers to their posts following lawful industrial action. In its previous comment, the Committee had requested the Government to review the Trade Union Act, 2016, in full consultation with the social partners, to strengthen the protection available to workers undertaking official and lawful industrial action. The Committee notes the TUC’s indication that it was not consulted on the issue despite being the most representative organization. The TUC reiterates its concern that the protection for trade union members who take lawful industrial action only extends to 12 weeks, with no guarantee of reinstatement and no prohibition on hiring replacements. The TUC adds that in July 2022, the Government ended a ban on the supply of workers by employment agencies as temporary or permanent replacements for striking workers, a change which was opposed by the social partners. The Committee notes with regret that the Government reiterates its previous position that the existing measures in place to protect striking workers are sufficient. The Government explains that a balanced legal system cannot ensure that striking workers are not dismissed under any circumstances for taking industrial action, considering that protracted industrial action threatens the existence of businesses and the livelihood of non-striking employees. The Committee once again recalls that making the return-to-work conditional on time limits and on the employer’s consent constitute obstacles to the effective exercise of the right to strike, essential for workers to promote and defend the interests of their members. The Committee therefore urges the Government to review the legislation in question, in full consultation with workers’ and employers’ organizations, with a view to strengthening the protection available to workers who stage official and lawfully organized industrial action and to provide information on steps taken in this regard."

D : USDOS

USDOS: US Department of States' Country Reports on Human Rights Practices

"Industrial action, including strike action organized by a trade union, was legal provided conditions were met. According to the International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), the ability to strike in the country was “limited” due to prohibitions against political and solidarity strikes, lengthy procedures for calling strikes, loopholes that allowed employers to use recruitment agencies to replace strikers, and the ability of employers to seek injunctions against unions before a strike had begun if the union did not observe all legal steps in organizing the strike. In addition, the ITUC noted the six-month mandate that arose from a union vote to strike, whether negotiations had concluded or not, placed undue burdens on unions and their members. "